And the voice gives me the chills...
May. 20th, 2008 10:25 amThis is beautiful, in a very twisted sort of way. One assumes that it was intended to be the Devil in a slightly less redhorned-and-goofy way, but it matches up perfectly to some rather disturbed descriptions I've heard of God that supposedly justify the actions they say he takes.
Nightmare fuel if you're a little kid, obviously, but it makes a statement that I don't believe it meant to.
Nightmare fuel if you're a little kid, obviously, but it makes a statement that I don't believe it meant to.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 06:42 pm (UTC)SO CREEPY. (And extra creepy for being claymation.) Someday I need to to see the whole movie
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 08:18 pm (UTC)But this scene in particular is so grotesque that it moves me.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 10:31 pm (UTC)Just a little religious LSD. Enjoy the trip.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 12:18 am (UTC)I think the clip might have actually been banned at some point.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-18 09:35 pm (UTC)Going off of what Fadura said about the flood in particular (because for me, that strikes me as a stronger modus operandi for destruction than lightning, the latter making me think more of Zeus. XD), if Satan'd had used that, I'd almost would have wished that the character wouldn't have been named at all, so there'd be that very ambiguous line between God and Satan. But because he was named (and I feel very odd for saying "he" for some reason), it makes you think about what angels really are like, what God is like as an extension.
The fact that his name is Satan but he calls himself an angel makes me think as well. Maybe it's because "Satan" is much more widely-recognized than "Lucifer", and there's a greater shock at hearing the name, but the fact that he still refers himself as an angel makes me think that there's no such thing as "the devil". In this case, I can really only think of the name "devil" as simply being a title distinguishing him from the fold of other angels, certainly not something to be equated with evils and horrors unimaginable. You could say that he's mocking them almost, in that he's making no distinction between him and them, which tickles me a bit. (I thought of something else to counter that point but it slipped my mind when I counter-countered it. You follow? Yeah, neither did my brain. It's why it said "fuck you" and stopped working. @_@)
God, that video is making me think so much. @_@ I keep thinking of one dynamic after the other after the other after the other between the God/Satan thing. It almost makes me want to write something on it. XD
no subject
Date: 2008-08-19 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-19 01:30 am (UTC)Or was booted out, whichever. XD
no subject
Date: 2008-08-19 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-18 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-18 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-26 03:02 pm (UTC)And hey Vyn!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 05:29 am (UTC)Now I feel bad for killing them when they act stupid (with lighting too).
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 05:46 pm (UTC)I have to admit, that clip made me think about matters I usually avoid.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 06:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 04:06 pm (UTC)The casual amusement part especially doesn't fit in with Christianity, as God wouldn't have sent Jesus to die for casual amusement ... but in Judaism, that certainly makes more sense, from what I've seen of the Old Testament (if the OT -- "Hebrew Scriptures"? -- is true to Judaism.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 01:06 am (UTC)Sorry, back on topic now. :)