(no subject)

[seiberwing]

I got into Anglia Ruskin! In the land of the Britons and squash and public transportation! Squee!

^_^

...will miss the Buffination, though. But still squee.

Comments

[goldcelestial.livejournal.com]

yaaaay!!!!

[cutiebirdgal.livejournal.com]

Congrats and stuff! And Gary should be informed of this, I suppose...

[seiberwing.livejournal.com]

Yeah. He on AIM any much?

[cutiebirdgal.livejournal.com]

MSN, and no, almost never. He's been on once all summer. It's kind of hard to get a hold of him... i suggest posting on his facebook wall. That's worked the best.

[seiberwing.livejournal.com]

I'll do that, or the next time he makes an LJ post.

[lonescorpion.livejournal.com]

Wa hey! Result :)

I still don't understand what you see in our transportation system. The bus routes in Cambridge are more expensive than in London despite the town being a fraction of the size. Is having a really crappy bus system really that much better than having no bus system at all? *is skeptical*

[koilungfish.livejournal.com]

Yes. Because if there was no bus system at all then I wouldn't be able to leave the village except in a *taxi*.

[seiberwing.livejournal.com]

Here's the thing. In my part of America, you have a car or you have nothing at all. That means finding parking spaces, finding your way around to places you've never been before, and having to pay increasingly silly prices for gasoline. Buses just seem to make more sense.

And they're a novelty so I like them.

on the subject of transportation:

[goldcelestial.livejournal.com]

did you know that trolleys are actually the most fuel efficient and cheap way to travel?
it's kinda neat and amazing...
and so disappointing that they are in so few cities......

anyway, yay for bus system!

Re: on the subject of transportation:

[seiberwing.livejournal.com]

It's 'cause they require having the rails laid down, which makes it harder to alter routes. But yes.