> The gay marriage ban in Tennessee passed by 81%.
Hell yeah! Now we just have to ban "marriage" from our legal system, period. You never did tell me what you thought of my actual solution.
> Meaning 81% of the state's voting population are against gay couples having the same rights given to straight couples,
Um, no. I voted Yes to ban it, because I believe the definition of "marriage" is the union between a man, and a woman. As you've seen in my journal entry, that has absolutely nothing to do with anyone's rights. Marriage belongs in a social/cultural function, not in a legal system.
> a rationale that basically boils down to "the Bible said so, now let's force it on everyone else".
Good job, blame somebody. That helps a lot, doesn't it? Doesn't it make you feel so much better?
Maybe 1) people don't want to change the definition, or 2) simply don't like gays (an opinion to which they're perfectly entitled.)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-11 01:37 am (UTC)Hell yeah! Now we just have to ban "marriage" from our legal system, period. You never did tell me what you thought of my actual solution.
> Meaning 81% of the state's voting population are against gay couples having the same rights given to straight couples,
Um, no. I voted Yes to ban it, because I believe the definition of "marriage" is the union between a man, and a woman. As you've seen in my journal entry, that has absolutely nothing to do with anyone's rights. Marriage belongs in a social/cultural function, not in a legal system.
> a rationale that basically boils down to "the Bible said so, now let's force it on everyone else".
Good job, blame somebody. That helps a lot, doesn't it? Doesn't it make you feel so much better?
Maybe 1) people don't want to change the definition, or 2) simply don't like gays (an opinion to which they're perfectly entitled.)