seiberwing: (Democracy)
seiberwing ([personal profile] seiberwing) wrote2009-02-24 09:11 pm

It's thoughts on yaoi time again, ladies and gentlemen!

A gay man posts a secret on [livejournal.com profile] fandomsecrets about how he hates that yaoi fangirls fetishize his sexuality, and understandably the entire thing starts wanking faster than a submarine engineer who's gotten on the internet for the first time in a year and a half. I get into it here and here for the most part, but pretty much everyone's sharing their thoughts on the matter.

(Warning: Image heavy. For the dialup-gifted, the secret in question is here.)

My thoughts, highly distilled, are that traditional yaoi isn't fetishizing a sexuality so much as a specific ideal and dynamic, and anyone who thinks that real gay men act like that has a few more problems than the doujinshi on her hard drive. Any thoughts from the audience?
ext_9605: A lungfish with the caption "Where are my eggs benedict?" -- because animals asking for strange food is funny! (Default)

[identity profile] dunmurderin.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 08:48 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see where the number of people doing it matters, particularly since the secret in question was complaining about the objectification of gay men within fandom where the majority of slash writers are women.

What really annoys me the implication that this guy shouldn't object to something that clearly bothers him because according to those doing the offending it doesn't have enough of an impact to be a problem. When exactly is he allowed to be angry about this?

[identity profile] seiberwing.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 09:33 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm, I would consider slash a far different thing from yaoi. A reasonable portion of slash doesn't fetish homosexuality, it fetishizes those two (three, four, whatever) characters having sex. Look at all the kink memes, for instance; clearly sexuality alone is not sufficient.

He's allowed to be angry any time he pleases; goodness knows I get angry over smaller things in fandom. I just don't think it's a worthy cause until it starts affecting the real world.
ext_9605: A lungfish with the caption "Where are my eggs benedict?" -- because animals asking for strange food is funny! (Default)

[identity profile] dunmurderin.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 11:15 am (UTC)(link)
But the attitudes of those fans he's complaining about DO affect the real world because their attitudes don't magically shut off when they're away from the computer and they turn into people who understand that gay men AREN'T like that.

I've run into people who have asked me and my girlfriend which one of us is the man in the relationship -- I'm pretty sure at least once we were TOLD which one of us was the man. And that's by people who thought they were being funny and who reacted to being told they weren't with an attitude not too much dissimilar to the one you're showing, namely that there wasn't any sense making a big deal over something that wasn't important to them.

[identity profile] seiberwing.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
Realistically, how many people are encouraged to think that by yaoi? The perception of there needing to be a man and a woman in any relationship regardless of gender comes more from Western heterosexist ideals.
ext_9605: A lungfish with the caption "Where are my eggs benedict?" -- because animals asking for strange food is funny! (Default)

[identity profile] dunmurderin.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 11:56 am (UTC)(link)
Probably not a statistically significant amount -- which still doesn't change the fact that this guy doesn't deserve to have his offense dismissed as unimportant because you don't think it's a problem.

Clearly we can go no further with this.

[identity profile] seiberwing.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough, although I'm not sure it warrants an unfriending. The problem in this debate is that neither of us are gay men -- in the fandomsecrets post, there were gay men both for and against your position on the subject.